Movie Review: A Monster Calls

amonstercalls

Director: J.A. Bayona

Writers: Patrick NessSiobhan Dowd

Stars:  Lewis MacDougall, Sigourney Weaver, Felicity Jones

Verdict: A joy

WARNING! WARNING! I WAS A LITTLE BIT HUNGOVER WHEN I WATCHED THIS MOVIE! I did it for Black Mountain Poets it’s only fair I give equal treatment. 

A Monster Calls, is in a sense a modern fairytale, although it also has some other framed fairytales in it. The plot is this; Conor has problems, his mother has cancer, his Dad lives in America and his Grandmum, the only person left to care for Conor, has a lot of trouble expressing her emotions and being warm or well, motherly. He’s also bullied by kids that seem like Draco Malfoy but violent and actually mean instead of just an entitles prick. He then sees a monster of the title who says I will tell you three stories, at at the end you will tell me a fourth and it will be your truth. 

I loved this film, I thought it was powerful, poignant, visuallly ravishing, and heartbreaking. It’s the type of film they don’t make anymore, a properly emotional family film. It’s score compose by Fernando Velázquez, (Crimson Peak, Mama), feels like it would be a good match for The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe or The Railway Children or Goodbye, Mr. Chips. I mean of course it’s British they all are, we have a really good taste for bittersweet melancholia I think. It’s set in the grim houseing blocks that seem lifted out of Scott & Bailey in which the best of those films took place, and like the best of those films, it sublimely blends heartbreaking and uplifting. I tell you right now, if my eyes weren’t already caked in hangover I would have shed buckets, I did shed a tear but I also chocked up in the way you do when you cry, many times, just without the actual waterworks coming. That being said, the actal message of the film is uplifting a hell, and one that is universal, and true, it really feels like it comes from a place of honesty. 

The central performance of Connor from Lewis MacDougall, (Pan) is lovely. He does have hints of that sort of child performance where he’s really trying to act and it’s bleedingly obvious, but that’s rare and he really plays it with intensity and honesty that more often than not only comes from children. He also has this really angular and expressive face etched in child like innocence that beleis his potential for honest intensity. 

It’s effects are breathtaking. While the more surreal incedents take place you can feel how they would really work on page but then that also means that it’s only more incredible how cinematic the sequences are. How well it’s translated cinematically. At the points when the giant is telling his stories it breaks into wonderful hand drawn animations and watercolours that are just astonishing and expressive and beautiful. The giant is also possitively terrifying, at least he would be to the target audience of this film, and he’s realised wonderfully not only visually but also his voice, which is done by Liam Neeson, (Schindler’s List, Taken). Lian Neeson is quickly joining the likes of Morgan Freeman, (The Shawshank Redemption, Se7en), and Lawrence Olivier, (Rebecca, Marathon Man), as actors with just extraordiarily cinematic voices. Gary Oldman can do it too but he only breaks it out for the really cool roles like Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. The bass of Neeson’s voice may have been incresed in post but it’s still perfect casting. 

The rest of the supporting performances are also on point. Toby Kebbel, (Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Warcraft: The Beginning) is really good but not showy as the Dad who’s much better at the friend side of being a Dad than the Dad part of being a Dad. Sigourney Weaver, (Alien) can do an English accent; who knew? And Felicity Jones is actually really, really good as the Mum. I didn’t like her at all  in Rogue One (I actually remember thinking she was allright in romance trash Like Crazy) but she really shows mature acting chops here. 

This film was directed by J.A. Bayona who made The Orphanage, the Spanish version, which was produced by Guillermo del Toro, which incedentally my video game design friend who I’ve mentioned frequently on this blog, made a video essay of for his media A Level. I do think that this film owes something to some of del Toro’s work like Pan’s Labyrinth. They both explore the boundary between reality and imaginary fantasy and children escaping from worlds of crippling sadness and unhappiness into something fantastical but which is also in ways equally as threatening. I do think Pan’s Labyrinth may well be better, but I defintely enjoyed this more.

When I first saw the trailer for this I thought it looked like The BFG again beause well that film was in theatres but it’s so not. It might be a bit sad but it is also really happy don’t worry, it’s not misery porn. It’s really good, bring tissues. 

Movie Review: The Dark Knight

Heaths-Joker-300x128.jpg.jpg

Director: Christopher Nolan

Writers: Jonathan Nolan, Christopher NolanDavid S. GoyerBob Kane

Stars: Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Aaron Eckhart

Verdict: Really, really solid

So, the 4th best film on IMDb is it? Hmm, we’ll see. Better than Fight Club and The Empire Strikes Back hmm? Strangely enough if you ask most people they won’t list this as their favourite Christopher Nolan film I think. Or at least most Nolan fans, or film fans, just people who know about Nolan as a director. For Nolan’s most famous movie, it’s probably the one that’s the least… I don’t know, Nolany..? Nolanesque..? In the style of soon-to-be-sir-if-we-still-made-sirs Christopher Nolan?

In this grim crime drama that transplants the idological battle of Batman: The Killing Joke for a modern age. The Joker, instead of a conflicted, tragic villain that fit distincly into the post-Vietnam, post-Watergate mallaise that Alan Moore actively contributed to with works like Watchmen, is now a Nitzien, overbearing force of evil and terrorism to match post 9/11 anxieties. In Batman, he finds an opponent to match his wit, skill, and sheer craziness. This isn’t the only ideological battle represented in The Dark Knight as Batman and several other characters question whether a city as corrupt as Gotham needs the threat of Batman or an inspiration to keep them in order, the inspiration coming in the form of ‘white knight’ Harvey Dent. 

These anxities are never really settled upon to the detriment of the film, because the film thinks it provides an answer but is conflicted within itself. This lack of thematic resolution would be fine if the film itself was playing towards that. In it’s absence, the film becomes more about the characters or Batman and the Joker themselves. In a more realistic world like the one Nolan creates, these characters need to be crafted from scratch and it then becomes a character study of the two of them. 

I am a big fan of Christopher Nolan. In an age when big, blockbuster entertainment is playing increasingly to the dumb strain in viewers, Nolan flies the Union Jack and makes films big budget fair that treats it’s general cinema going audience as if they have a brain in their heads, with works like Inception, and proves that audiences are much more intelligent than studios give them credit for. When it comes to British Cinema Nolan shows you what can be done. My favourite film of his may be The Prestige because it marries perfectly his duel strain of intelligent narrative constructions and emotion story arcs. The Dark Knight is maybe not quite as impressive as The Prestige but it actually has a suprising amount of both, which I only really noticed this time of watching, on my 3rd viewing of this film. There were moments that I felt really emotionally engaged in the story in a way I didn’t really either other time I watched it. On previous watches I found it a very cynical, workman like film. It was something Nolan made as a career choice more than an artistic peice which I still think might be true but doesn’t come out so much to the detreiment of the film. I also thought that in this world they worked so hard to make the characters of Batman and The Joker seem really realistic and grounded that they forgot about all the other characters. Which I still think, but again, it didn’t come through quite so much. 

There are certain aspects of The Dark Knight that have passed into the public concioussness to the extent that I almost feel like I don’t have to talk about them because it just goes without saying. However, it’s a review, I have to otherwise I’m missing the point of a review, so; Heath Ledger, (Brokeback Mountain, 10 Things I Hate About You) is really, really incredible. He should have won his Oscar, I don’t know if he would have done if he hadn’t died but my god he deserved it. Jared Leto’s Joker in Suicide Squad constantly describes himself as this kind of force of nature, ‘a state of mind’, but he’s so not. Heath Ledger, is. He might have become a true acting legend if he’d stayed alive. Wally Pfister’s, (MoneyballInception), cinematography is also fantastic; bot him and composers James Newon Howard (Michael Clayton, The Hunger Games: Catching Fire) and Hanz Zimmer, (Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl, The Lion King) craft that typical Nolanesque, (not this again), sense of surging forward, the film constantly driving forward, and like it’s envoy of Dent carrying cars, stops for no one. 

I love that it’s a proper movie. The way to make a good comic book movie, and those strugging to resurrect video game movies from what Uwe Boll, (House of the DeadBloodRayne, Far Cry), has done should also apply this, is to just make a proper movie. This is why this works, and why the MCU movies work, it’s because the character motivations are plotted out properly. It’s why the Batman stuff is the best stuff in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, because we understand exactly his character, who he is, and where he’s at. It’s why I think despite these sniffy reviews, if you detatch yourself from the game, the upcoming Assassin’s Creed might actually be fun, because it’s made by a proper filmmaker. 

In terms of the supporting performances, they’re all really really functional, in a good way. Christian Bale is perfectly fine, even if he sometimes verges a bit too far into his iconic Patrick Bateman from American Psycho, but maybe that’s intentional. Gary Oldman, (Léon: The Professional, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy), one of my favourite actors working, plays Gordon exactly as one should, never takes centre stage but is exactly as he is meant to be, and is played note perfect. Morgan Freeman, (The Shawshank Redemption, Se7en) just does that Morgan Freeman thing of having a wonderful voice and being slightly better than you. Aaron Eckhart, (Thank You for Smoking, Olympus Has FallenFrasier) is actually much, much better in the second half of the film, when his character takes on new dimentions, quite literally. 

The Dark Knight is more a crime drama than a superhero films. More Peckinpah, (The Wild BunchStraw DogsBring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia), than Burton, (Edward Scissorhands, BeetlejuiceBatman). Although it’s not perfect there is very little that’s actively bad about it, and a proud addition to both the linneage of comic book films and the filmography of the Nolan borthers, Chris and his borther Jonathan, (Memento, WestworldPerson of Interest), who co-wrote it. I just wish they’re been there when they were making Watchmen